|
"substitution... no basis whatever, either in Holy
Scripture or in Christian antiquity."
"The notion of a formal substitution by apostolic
authority of the Lord's day [meaning Sunday] for the
Jewish Sabbath [or the first for the seventh day]...and
the transference to it, perhaps in a spiritualized form,
of the sabbatical obligation established by the promulgation
of the fourth commandment, has no basis whatever, either
in Holy Scripture or in Christian antiquity." -
SIR WILLIAM SMITH AND SAMUEL CHEETHAM, "A Dictionary
of Christian Antiquities," Vol. 11, page 182, Article
"Sabbath."
"This long series of temporal enactments (in considering
which we have, for the sake of exhibiting them as a
whole, anticipated chronological order) must have told
very powerfully upon the conception of the Lord's day
in the church itself, not only tending to formalize
its celebration, but to invest it in great degree with
the character of a sabbath. Still, however, there was
no connexion of its observance with the obligation of
the fourth commandment, and therefore no application
to it either of the laws of the Jewish sabbath, or of
our Lord's teaching on the subject, as modifying and
spiritualizing these laws." -Id., page 1047

|